[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UML
Ack, UML. :p
Its some stupid OO design scheme. Hani and I had to do a lot of stuff in
it last quarter for 110. Basically, you draw boxes for classes, and
arrows showing class relationships... but its a lot more complicated
then that. It is actuslly complex enough that if you draw a good UML
diagram in something like Visio Pro, it will actually generate source
code for you.
Still - yuck.
-Bill
Brian Degenhardt wrote:
>
> As a recent convert to the OO paradigm, I have begun to search for
> literature beyond the "Gang of Four" book and Effecive C++. In doing so,
> I have learned two hard truths:
>
> First, there are a million books on this thing called UML, but I really
> have no idea what it is.
>
> Second, there are no books which outline libstdc++ and STL. Well, there
> are a bunch of books on STL, but none on amazon have very good ratings.
>
> So, my question is... wtf is UML, and if I am interested in OO
> programming, am I only gonna find it in java? I have a lot of trouble
> using libc and C++, it just doesn't work.
>
> Last rant. Why does ieng9 have a libstdc++ from 1992 and why won't anyone
> upgrade it? Sven, don't you work for ACS? Somebody please fix this
> before I am finished with 131!
>
> </rant>
>
> sorry about that. friday night...
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: UML
- From: Brian Degenhardt <earthkam.bdegenha@ucsd.edu>
- References:
- UML
- From: Brian Degenhardt <earthkam.bdegenha@ucsd.edu>